Skip to content
  • Delivering Ukrainian agricultural products to the world
  • Verified information
  • Reliable data
  • Independent platform

Codex Standard for Pulses

International reference specification for dried pulses in trade

Dried, shelled pulses for direct human consumption or further processing

  • Issuing bodiesFAO/WHO
  • Geographic scopeGlobal
  • Legal statusVoluntary
  • Standard typeProduct

Overview

The Codex Alimentarius standard for pulses is the closest thing the trade has to a common technical language. It does not set prices, it does not create obligations by itself, and it is not a food safety regulation. What it does is define the product category and the vocabulary of defects precisely enough that a buyer in Rotterdam and a processor in Kropyvnytskyi can write down the same specification and mean the same thing.

What the standard covers

The scope is dried, shelled pulse seed intended for human food use, whether traded whole, split or dehulled. Lentils, chickpeas, dry beans of the common bean species, dry peas, faba beans and several minor legumes fall inside. Crops grown primarily for oil extraction sit outside, as do fresh green legumes, which are handled as vegetables.

Within that scope the standard addresses composition and essential quality factors: what the seed must be, what may be present alongside it, and how the product is described. It sets out the defect categories that dominate commercial grading — foreign matter, mineral matter, other pulses, insect-damaged seed, mould-damaged seed, shrivelled and immature seed, broken and split seed where splits are not the traded form, and discoloured seed. Each is a defined term, which is the standard’s principal contribution.

How it is used in a real contract

Almost no pulse contract quotes the standard alone. The normal construction layers three documents: a trade contract form supplying the commercial terms, this standard supplying the definitions, and a schedule of tolerances agreed between the parties supplying the numbers. Analytical methods are then pinned to specific ISO or AOAC procedures so that two laboratories testing the same sample reach the same answer.

Where the standard is most valuable is at the margin. When a cargo arrives and the receiver claims excessive damaged seed, the argument is almost never about the percentage — it is about what counts as damaged. Contracts that incorporate the Codex definitions resolve that question on paper instead of in arbitration.

Relationship to EU market access

For a consignment entering the European Union, the binding requirements come from EU law: residue limits, contaminant limits, hygiene obligations, official controls at the border and, for organic goods, the organic regulation and its import certificate. The Codex standard governs none of that. A Ukrainian exporter should therefore treat Codex compliance as the commercial baseline and EU compliance as the access condition, and should never assume one implies the other.

Practical guidance for Ukrainian suppliers

Build the works specification around the Codex vocabulary from the start. Train the intake laboratory to grade using those categories, record results in the same terms, and issue the certificate of analysis with the same headings. When a European buyer’s specification arrives written in the same language, the comparison becomes mechanical rather than interpretive. See the pulse cleaning, sorting and grading guide for how each defect category is physically removed, and GAFTA contract terms for pulses for the commercial layer that sits above it.

  • Defines what a pulse is

    The standard scopes the crops it covers — dried, shelled seeds of leguminous plants for food use — and explicitly excludes oilseed legumes such as soya and groundnut, which have their own instruments. This matters when a contract says "Codex quality" without saying which Codex.

  • Sets the defect vocabulary

    Foreign matter, other pulses, damaged seed, shrivelled seed, broken seed and discoloured seed are all defined terms. Most commercial specifications simply attach tolerances to these definitions, which is why the vocabulary is worth reading even when the tolerances are contractual.

  • Frames moisture and hygiene

    The standard addresses moisture in the context of storage stability and refers hygiene requirements out to the general Codex hygiene texts rather than restating them. Consult the current text for the applicable limits.

  • Anchors labelling of the class

    Class, variety group and processing form — whole, split, dehulled — are the descriptors the standard expects to see declared, which maps directly onto how lentils and chickpeas are traded.

Where it Applies

  • Drafting a purchase specification

    Use the Codex definitions as the base layer and add contractual tolerances on top. This avoids the common failure where buyer and seller each use their own definition of "broken" and discover the mismatch at discharge.

  • Resolving a quality dispute

    Where a contract references the standard, the defect definitions become the referee vocabulary for a survey report. Superintendents will grade against them.

  • Aligning across origins

    A buyer sourcing the same crop from Ukraine, Türkiye and Canada can hold one specification across all three because each origin's national standard is derived from or compatible with the Codex text.

How it Compares

Positioning against neighbouring schemes.

  • Against ISO pulse methods

    The Codex standard says what the product must be; the ISO pulse specification and test method documents say how to measure it. They are complementary, not alternatives, and a good specification cites both.

  • Against GAFTA contract terms

    Codex is a technical product standard with no contractual machinery. GAFTA forms supply the commercial and dispute framework. Most pulse contracts use a GAFTA form with a Codex-derived quality clause.

  • Against EU food law

    Codex is voluntary; EU regulation is binding for goods placed on the EU market. Where the two differ, EU law governs the shipment and Codex governs the commercial expectation.

FAQ

Is compliance with the Codex pulses standard mandatory?

No. Codex standards are voluntary reference texts. They become binding only when a national authority adopts them into law or when a contract incorporates them by reference — which pulse contracts frequently do.

Does the standard set a maximum moisture figure?

The text addresses moisture, but the operative figure for any given shipment comes from the destination’s requirements and the contract. Check the current consolidated text rather than relying on a number quoted second-hand.

Does it cover pesticide residues and contaminants?

Not directly. It refers out to the Codex maximum residue limits and the general contaminants standard. For EU-bound cargo, the EU residue and contaminant regulations are the binding reference.

Does it apply to pulse flour?

No. The standard covers whole and split dried pulses. Milled products fall under the general cereal and flour hygiene texts and, for claims, the relevant labelling instruments.

Sources & References

  • CXS 171-1989 Standard for Certain PulsesCodex Alimentarius Commission, FAO and WHO · accessed August 22, 2026Definitions, quality factors, moisture and defect categories for the main dry pulse species. The baseline most private pulse specifications are written on top of.
  • ISO 605 Pulses – Determination of impurities, size, foreign odours, insects, and species and varietyInternational Organization for Standardization · accessed August 22, 2026The method that makes an impurity percentage comparable between two laboratories. Without a named method, two certificates reporting the same figure are not reporting the same thing.
  • Codex Alimentarius standards for dried fruitsFAO and WHO, Codex Alimentarius Commission · accessed August 22, 2026Codex commodity standards are a reference point for moisture and defect tolerances where no EU limit exists. They are not binding in the EU.
  • CXS 193-1995 General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and FeedCodex Alimentarius Commission, FAO and WHO · accessed August 22, 2026The international counterpart to the Union contaminants regulation, carrying maximum levels for aflatoxins in several nut categories alongside the same ready-to-eat and further-processing distinction. Useful when a contract sits outside the Union or when a supplier needs the structure of the Union rules explained by analogy with something already familiar.

Evidence confidence: partial

Next step

Need these specifications confirmed for your order size?

Send the volume and destination and we reply with availability, packaging options and the documents required.

Vorezan publishes reference information for buyers and suppliers. We are not a certification body, a customs broker or a guarantor of any third party. Regulatory references point to the framework in force at the review date; verify the current consolidated text and your own obligations before relying on them commercially.

Last updated: August 22, 2026Sources & references